donate
Mercy for Justice

Everyday Justice magazine

A monthly series of in-depth, curated articles exploring Mercy's Critical Concerns and their intersection with current events and the work of justice.

August 2025

Articles from Mercy:

Local Justice News & Upcoming Mercy Events:

Justice Resources & Links


Critical Considerations

Are we doomed to a perpetual nuclear arms race?

Karen Donahue, RSM

The world reached a grim milestone this month with the 80th anniversaries, on August 6 and 9, of the obliteration of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by U.S. nuclear weapons, thus ushering in the nuclear age. In a recent article posted on the TomDispatch website, Eric Ross, organizer, educator, and PhD candidate in the history department at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, raises some troubling questions: why was there so little dissent from the scientists at Los Alamos, and what does that mean for us today?

However, there was some dissent. In June 1945, a group of scientists at the University of Chicago’s Metallurgical Laboratory, one of several teams working on various aspects of the bomb’s development, spoke out. Led by physicist James Franck, they sent a report to Secretary of War Henry Stimson “warning of the profound political and ethical consequences of employing such a bomb without exhausting all other alternatives.” By this time, it was clear that Germany, already defeated, had not developed a nuclear weapon. The prospect of a potential German atomic bomb had been the impetus for the Manhattan Project.

These scientists understood “that the atomic bomb wasn’t just a more powerful weapon but a fundamental transformation in the nature of warfare, an instrument of annihilation.” They recognized that the use of such a destructive weapon without sufficient military justification would undermine U.S. credibility in future arms control efforts. They also “observed that the development of the bomb under conditions of extreme wartime secrecy had created an abjectly anti-democratic situation, one in which the public was denied any opportunity to deliberate on such an irrevocable and consequential decision.” Nevertheless, Ross ends on an encouraging note: he says, “This history should also remind us that the development and use of nuclear weapons was not inevitable. There were those who spoke out and a different path might well have been possible. While we cannot know exactly how events would have unfolded had dissent been amplified rather than suppressed, we can raise our own voices now to demand a safer, saner future.”

Back to top


Love and care of creation in local ecologies

Rose Marie Tresp, RSM; Institute Justice Team

I recently attended the day-long “Fourth Annual Lake James Watershed Symposium”. The Lake James watershed includes the local area in North Carolina where I live. Our area is called the Catawba River Basin; I have been a member of the Catawba Riverkeeper Organization for several years. Catawba Riverkeeper is the only non-profit, on-the-water advocate for the entire 8,900 miles of waterways in the Catawba-Wateree River Basin that provides accurate, science-based information about our water and the issues affecting it.

The Symposium was held at the North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics in Morganton, NC about an hour’s drive from here. Generally, the programs I attend and the work I do are either on the macrolevel of climate change, its causes and alleviation, or the focus is on the microlevel of personal and organizational practices with the mantra of reduce, reuse, and recycle. But this symposium was quite different as its focus was on the middle level of conservation research and practices.  There were several short presentations on research about conserving and protecting the local ecology. One presentation was on the design of hiking trails. A bad hiking trail is one that leads to erosion and flooding. Another presentation was assessing and changing the route of streams since some streambed routes can cause more erosion and flooding. Another presentation was on the design of a local park so that heavy rains do not flood the housing development below the park. I really had never thought of these issues. I thought hiking trails just happened where it was convenient.

I also found it interesting that no one talked about or mentioned climate change. Clearly these people loved the land and volunteered in different ways to protect and conserve the land and water. Programs were designed and carried out to involve the youth in conservation. But maybe some of those attending really were not sure about climate change.

The themes of this symposium can remind us of a passage in Laudato Si’:

The entire material universe speaks of God’s love, his boundless affection for us. Soil, water, mountains: everything is, as it were, a caress of God. The history of our friendship with God is always linked to particular places which take on an intensely personal meaning; we all remember places, and revisiting those memories does us much good. Anyone who has grown up in the hills or used to sit by the spring to drink or played outdoors in the neighborhood square; going back to these places is a chance to recover something of their true selves. (84)

I am very glad that I attended this symposium; I will try to attend next year’s symposium. I learned a lot about the local ecology that I live in. I encourage everyone to seek out and support the local, non-profit conservation organizations in your area.

Back to top


Church document ahead of COP 30

Marianne Comfort; Institute Justice Team

Church leaders in the Global South are taking a strong role in the lead-up to this year’s international climate talks (COP 30) in Belem, Brazil.

Mercy Sister Rosita Sidasmed of Argentina participated in conversations that contributed to Climate Justice and the Common Home: Ecological Conversion, Transformation and Resistance to False Solutions. This document was first drafted by Church leaders in Latin America and the Caribbean, endorsed by bishop conferences in Africa and Asia, and then endorsed by the Vatican.

The document rejects the commodification of nature and extraction of minerals for renewable energy technologies as “false solutions” to the climate crisis. It instead demands that rich nations pay their “ecological debt” to countries most harmed by climate change; promotes phasing out fossil fuels and fairly taxing those who have benefited from these industries; calls for the defense of Indigenous peoples, ecosystems and impoverished communities; and recognizes climate migration as a challenge of justice and human rights. The authors invite everyone to “adopt a new lifestyle marked by joyful simplicity” that focuses on “living a productive and supportive life, in peace and harmony with our brothers and sisters and with ecosystems.” Specifically, they call for reducing unnecessary consumption and challenging military investments; fostering spiritual experiences of contemplation and love for all creation; working with scientists to respond to local, regional and global needs; encouraging food, energy and cultural projects; and promoting narratives of hope and common care.

Back to top

Article Archive

2025

August

Critical Considerations:

Are we doomed to a perpetual nuclear arms race?

Love and care of creation in local ecologies

Church document ahead of COP30

July

Critical Considerations:

What’s at stake in Israel’s destruction of Gaza?

Have you heard of Black August?

DEI—Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Mercy Life Gathering in Panama

June

Vampires, Sharecropping, and the Real History of Juneteenth

Protecting Children and Vulnerable Adults from Abuse in the Philippines

Critical Considerations:

What’s really driving border enforcement?

May

A letter to Pope Francis

Critical Considerations:

Is this really an emergency?

Trump’s attacks on women

April

The cultural battle advances

Critical Considerations:

What’s going on with tariffs?

Water extractivism in Palestine

March

Hope for Panama in truth

Deportation stigma in Jamaica

Critical Considerations:

Who benefits from tax cuts? Who pays?

April is SWANA Heritage Month

NETWORK webinar on U.S. federal policy

February

National declaration of emergency in Bajo Aguán

Critical Considerations:

Has the United States declared war on immigrants?

What energy emergency?

January

If you make a mess, clean it up! (Advocacy success in NY)

Youth claim climate victory in Montana court

Critical Considerations:

Was January 1, 2025 a wake-up call?

(click years to expand)

2024

December

Gender and climate justice

Critical Considerations:

Is the United States becoming a plutocracy?

Making nuclear weapons taboo

November

Critical Considerations:

What happened on November 5, 2024?

The Ecological Debt

October

Overturning the Chevron deference

Critical Considerations:

Who are the Israeli settlers and what motivates them?

Assassination of Honduran water protector deeply grieves Sisters of Mercy

September

God walks with his people: National Migration Week September 23–29

Critical Considerations:

What does CEO compensation say about corporate priorities?

Anxiety – election season can heighten it!

August

Critical Considerations:

What is Project 2025 all about?

Working to stop weapon exports to Haiti

Beyond Voting:

Participating in Elections, part 2

July

Critical Considerations:

Is there a better way to spend $91 billion?

Education, Agriculture, & Emigration in the Philippines

Beyond Voting:

Participating in Elections, part 1

June

Critical Considerations:

Are we creating a prison-industrial complex?

Conscience

Mercy student videos address the Critical Concerns

May

Critical Considerations:

Degrowth is the only sane survival plan

Argentina and the government of hate

Listening to a chorus of voices

April

Critical Considerations:

An Israeli Jesuit reflects on war in the Holy Land

Advocacy Success! Expanded Background Checks for Gun Sales

March

Military spending and national (in)security

February

The challenge Gaza war presents for American Jews

January

Gaza war threatens credibility of West’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law

2023

December

Climate Summit fails to adequately respond to gravity of climate crisis

November

Critical Considerations:

The dangers of conflating Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism

Red flag laws in jeopardy: faith voices speak to save them

October

Jewish and Palestinian perspectives on Gaza crisis

September

U.S. China tensions impact efforts to address climate change

August

When Good Economic Policy Isn’t Enough

July

States Move to Weaken Protections for Child Workers

June

Corporate Lobbyists at Climate Talks

May

Electric Vehicle Transition Challenges

April

Repudiating the Doctrine of Discovery

March

Misrepresenting War

February

The Rise of Christian Nationalism

January

How the News is Reported Affects What We Know

2022

December

How Corporations Took Over the Government

November

The Independent State Legislature Theory Explained

October

The Next Phase in the Voting Wars


Local Justice News & Upcoming Events

Check back soon!


Mercy Justice Resource Pages

Peace & Justice Calendars