July 2026
Articles from Mercy:
- • Critical Considerations Are contradictions determining U.S. elections? (Karen Donahue, RSM)
- • Ecumenical Advocacy Days as a first timer (John Charles McAllister-Ashley; Institute Justice Team)
Local Justice News & Upcoming Mercy Events
Justice Resources & Links
Critical Considerations
Are contradictions determining U.S. elections?
Karen Donahue, RSM
This month, the United States celebrated the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. However, this milestone comes at a time characterized by high levels of political polarization and just four months before the 2026 midterm elections, elections that could well determine the future direction of the country.
Two recent articles shed some light on questions that have puzzled political observers over the past several election cycles: why do people vote for candidates who do not promote their interests, or vote for candidates who are seriously flawed?
In an article published in the Guardian, Saida Grundy, associate professor of sociology and African American studies at Boston University, said that white working-class voters who comprise the MAGA base are motivated less by economic concerns than by “access to power over other racial groups.” Grundy goes on to examine the long history of efforts to prevent African American and low-income white workers from joining together and acting in solidarity around their common concerns.
She observes that when governments support multiracial democracy or are seen as responsive to Black social movements, working class and poor whites tend to support politicians who push for tax cuts and slash the programs on which low-income people rely. In closing she says, “No amount of persuasion will move those who have chosen to maintain control and violence over putting food on the table when the point of their trade-off is keeping others from putting food on theirs.”
In response to the senatorial primary elections in Maine and Texas, where two scandal-ridden candidates won, Charlie Hunt, an associate Professor of political science at Boise State University, discusses party polarization and negative partisanship, two factors which have greater consequences today than in past years.
The gap between the two major parties on policy choices, issue positions and culture is wide today. This polarization is moving beyond these differences to personal animosity between Republicans and Democrats and is escalating to the point where they not only disagree but see the other party as a threat.
Voters are now “making decisions based not on who should win elections but rather on who shouldn’t. The opposing party is not just the less preferred option – it’s a threat that must be stopped at all costs. Voters constantly report feeling the need to “hold their noses” and vote for the “lesser of two evils.” The alternative – the other party taking power – is too grave to permit a truly principled stand. As a result, the race to the bottom continues, because the other side will always be worse.”
Featured Contributor
Ecumenical Advocacy Days as a first timer
John Charles McAllister-Ashley; Institute Justice Team
John Charles, a member of the Justice Team, attended Ecumenical Advocacy Days (EAD) in Washington, D.C. for the first time in April 2026. This reflection is offered as a window into a first-time advocate’s experience for the benefit of other first-timers. This year marked EAD’s return to in-person advocacy after COVID-19 took the events online in 2020 after decades of annual events in D.C. The event, co-sponsored by the Mercy Justice Team, adopted a more grassroots-style feel in 2026 and is scheduled to return to D.C. in mid-April 2027.
This was the first time that I had attended an event with so many like-minded individuals. I learned so much and made amazing connections in a short 48 hours. From meeting people I only see periodically in on-screen, digital boxes (thank you, Zoom!) to making lasting connections with new people, it was an overwhelming experience but also so powerful to see that the work of justice is getting done by people in so many walks of life. I met a number of people who hold our Justice Director, Marianne Comfort, in high regard, and that really sealed the deal that I was in the right place.
I attended two workshops at EAD. Christian Watkins from NETWORK shared about How to Fight Authoritarianism, and Alex Parker of the ELCA Advocacy Office presented Advocacy 101, a solid foundation of where to start your advocacy as a beginner. I took a lot of what he said into our visits with House and Senate office staff.
Honestly, I was not in my element during our Capitol Hill visits, but I was accompanied by experienced advocates who carried the meetings, showed me the ropes, and made room for me to participate at a comfortable level. Our meetings, especially the first, were very productive. We met with Kweisi Mfume’s Legislative Director, Andrew Heineman. He spoke to us with respect and was very supportive of the FEMA Act of 2025 (H.R. 4669) and the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act (S. 455 / H.R. 1061). We also met with Senator Chris Van Hollen’s Legislative Correspondents, Myesha Hussein and Leo Confalone. They were both receptive to the FEMA Act and Protecting Sensitive Locations Act, but they were nowhere near as vocally supportive as our previous meeting. Finally, we met with Angela Alsobrooks’s National Security Advisor, Jonathan Lord. I was surprised our meeting was with him, as our subject bills were not in his area of expertise, but he seemed very optimistic about the FEMA Act and stated he would look into the Sensitive Locations Act. I was able to make a memorable connection in Senator Alsobrooks’s office, as I have a family member that works on her staff.
Overall, it was a great experience but not uncomplicated. The House and Senate office buildings create some sensory challenges with hard, echo-prone walls and confusing floorplans, and my discomfort was compounded by the feeling that I was underdressed. I enjoyed my time, but I would have felt more ready to express myself and speak up if I had done more homework on our chosen bills. I think with proper preparation, a more formal outfit, and a fresh haircut, I would fit exceptionally well in that environment and hold my own to contribute more meaningfully. Next time will be better, and there definitely will be a next time.
Article Archive
2026
July
Critical Considerations:
Are contradictions determining U.S. elections?
Ecumenical Advocacy Days as a first timer
June
Critical Considerations:
What does habeas corpus have to do with immigration?
Nutrition assistance and the Farm Bill
Guns, Pride, Juneteenth, and the Emanuel 9
May
Critical Considerations:
Has Eisenhower’s worst nightmare come true?
The nonviolent struggle in Peru (español)
Report on global fossil fuel transition conference
Catholic high school visits Casa Misericordia and Sister Mary Waskowiak
April
The dangers of ending TPS for Haiti
Santa Marta conference on fossil fuel transition
Voting: How we know voter fraud in the U.S. is very rare
U.N. Commission on the Status of Women
March
Voting: Threats to this fundamental right in democracies
Nurturing Justice and Living Faith
Permitting reform and extractivism
High School student’s reflection on advocacy immersion in Washington, D.C.
February
Critical Considerations:
We have a choice: oligarchy or democracy?
Critical Concerns in Focus: Immigration (español)
Names and naming make a difference in perceptions of reality
January
Critical Considerations:
(click years to expand)
2025
December
The Catholic Church responds to the threat of authoritarianism
Critical Considerations:
The United States: global citizen or global pariah?
November
Critical Considerations:
NSPM-7: Countering or perpetrating political violence?
Advocating on harms of extractive industries
Argentina y el avance del colonialismo / Argentina and the advance of colonialism
October
Critical Considerations:
Is it time to reform the Insurrection Act?
COP 30 in the Amazon & Raising Hope in Rome
The dangers of falsely linking Tylenol to autism
September
Mercy sisters call for urgent defense of immigrants
Critical Considerations:
What is Posse Comitatus all about?
Everyday pilgrimages: the Earth is the Lord’s
August
Critical Considerations:
Are we doomed to a perpetual nuclear arms race?
Love and care of creation in local ecologies
Church document ahead of COP30
July
Critical Considerations:
What’s at stake in Israel’s destruction of Gaza?
Have you heard of Black August?
DEI—Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Mercy Life Gathering in Panama
June
Vampires, Sharecropping, and the Real History of Juneteenth
Protecting Children and Vulnerable Adults from Abuse in the Philippines
Critical Considerations:
What’s really driving border enforcement?
May
Critical Considerations:
April
Critical Considerations:
Water extractivism in Palestine
March
Critical Considerations:
Who benefits from tax cuts? Who pays?
NETWORK webinar on U.S. federal policy
February
National declaration of emergency in Bajo Aguán
Critical Considerations:
Has the United States declared war on immigrants?
January
If you make a mess, clean it up! (Advocacy success in NY)
Youth claim climate victory in Montana court
Critical Considerations:
2024
December
Critical Considerations:
Is the United States becoming a plutocracy?
November
Critical Considerations:
What happened on November 5, 2024?
October
Overturning the Chevron deference
Critical Considerations:
Who are the Israeli settlers and what motivates them?
Assassination of Honduran water protector deeply grieves Sisters of Mercy
September
God walks with his people: National Migration Week September 23–29
Critical Considerations:
What does CEO compensation say about corporate priorities?
Anxiety – election season can heighten it!
August
Critical Considerations:
What is Project 2025 all about?
Working to stop weapon exports to Haiti
Participating in Elections, part 2
July
Critical Considerations:
Is there a better way to spend $91 billion?
Education, Agriculture, & Emigration in the Philippines
Participating in Elections, part 1
June
Critical Considerations:
Are we creating a prison-industrial complex?
Mercy student videos address the Critical Concerns
May
Critical Considerations:
Degrowth is the only sane survival plan
Argentina and the government of hate
Listening to a chorus of voices
April
Critical Considerations:
An Israeli Jesuit reflects on war in the Holy Land
Advocacy Success! Expanded Background Checks for Gun Sales
March
Military spending and national (in)security
February
The challenge Gaza war presents for American Jews
January
Gaza war threatens credibility of West’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law
2023
December
Climate Summit fails to adequately respond to gravity of climate crisis
November
Critical Considerations:
The dangers of conflating Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism
Red flag laws in jeopardy: faith voices speak to save them
October
Jewish and Palestinian perspectives on Gaza crisis
September
U.S. China tensions impact efforts to address climate change
August
When Good Economic Policy Isn’t Enough
July
States Move to Weaken Protections for Child Workers
June
Corporate Lobbyists at Climate Talks
May
Electric Vehicle Transition Challenges
April
Repudiating the Doctrine of Discovery
March
February
The Rise of Christian Nationalism
January
2022
December
How Corporations Took Over the Government
November
The Independent State Legislature Theory Explained
October
Local Justice News & Upcoming Events
Justice Resources & Links
Mercy Justice Resource Pages
- Resources for Immigrants
- Advocacy Amplified! (Mercy Justice Videos on advocacy tools)
- Mercy Walks with Migrants (interviews with Mercy sisters on immigration work)
- Mercy Tips to Care for the Earth







