donate

November 2025

Articles from Mercy:

Local Justice News & Upcoming Mercy Events:

Justice Resources & Links


Critical Considerations

NSPM-7: Countering or perpetrating political violence?

Karen Donahue, RSM

On September 25, 2025, President Donald Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7) titled Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence. In justifying the need for such a measure, the president states that politically motivated violence is increasing dramatically in the U.S., but he only cites acts of violence perpetrated by so-called leftist groups and completely ignores violence from the right. For example, he never mentions the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021 or the murders of two Minnesota state legislators and their spouses in June 2025.

The president believes that a vast left-wing conspiracy is behind these acts, although there is little evidence to support such a claim. NSPM-7 calls on federal agencies to prioritize investigation of a number of identities and ideologies that it sees as anti-fascist. These include “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.”

As the Brennan Center notes, “this breathtakingly broad list easily encompasses everyone from labor organizers, socialists, many libertarians, those who criticize Christianity, pro-immigration groups, anti-ICE protesters, and racial justice and transgender activists, to anyone who holds views that the administration considers to be ‘anti-American.’ Under NSPM-7, the antifascist label can be attached to any of these types of people and groups and many more besides, giving the government maximum flexibility to pick and choose its targets.”

However, in their analysis of NSPM-7, the ACLU says that “the president cannot rewrite the Constitution by memo or otherwise. No matter what the president says or tries to do through NSPM-7, the First Amendment constrains what federal agencies can do when it comes to punishing groups and people for exercising their rights to free speech, peaceful protest, and supporting causes by making donations. It also safeguards against viewpoint-based government discrimination, coercion, and retaliation.”

Back to top


Advocating on harms of extractive industries

Marianne Comfort; Institute Justice Team

Mercy Associate Alexis Stephens of Guyana, as part of her participation in Mercy International Association’s Mercy Emerging Leaders Fellowship (MELF), completed a research project on the oil and gas industry in her home country of Guyana. You may watch a 36-minute presentation of her work here.

Alexis realized that many people in Guyana didn’t understand the threats from an industry that was promising jobs and economic growth. While the country reportedly has the world’s fast-growing economy, she notes that this boom hasn’t resulted in prosperity for the people of Guyana. The government is using a lot of the money to build roads and bridges, for instance, which is disrupting local communities and displacing residents.

Alexis created a guide to advocacy on oil and gas in Guyana for her MELF final project. The Institute Justice Team has adapted her toolkit to be useful in other countries and addressing all forms of extractive industries. You may find that here (en Español).

This toolkit is designed to equip individuals and organizations with the knowledge and tools necessary to advocate for a just transition away from fossil fuels, particularly within the oil and gas industry, mining, deforestation and other forms of large-scale extraction of resources. It aims to empower advocates to address the social, economic, and environmental inequalities associated with extraction, transportation, and consumption while promoting sustainable and equitable alternatives. The toolkit provides many resources to assist individuals in planning an advocacy campaign around the harms of extractive industries. These resources include suggestions for communication and education, coalition building, direct action, research and analysis, and legal action.

Back to top


Argentina and the advance of colonialism

Ana Siufi, RSM; Institute Justice Team

We live in a time of growing confusion, denials of truth, manipulations, violence, and neocolonialism in the Western world, and Argentina is a good example of this. In two years of [President] Milei’s misgovernment, while repeating in the mainstream media and social networks that they seek freedom, to defend the republic and become a great power, in reality we see repression, dictatorial decisions, the elimination of fundamental rights, the imposition of negative values such as hatred, rejection and violence, the exponential growth of unemployment, inequality, foreign debt, the narco-state and a shameful submission to foreign powers.

Never before has a government – not even the military dictatorship – shown such obedience to Anglo-Zionism by submitting to the orders of the U.S. Treasury, the International Monetary Fund, significant investment funds, J.P. Morgan (which has several former employees as officials in the Ministry of Economy), and the State of Israel.

All those mentioned above give orders to our government intending to impose poor living conditions on the majority, to plunder our gold reserves that have already gone to Great Britain, to facilitate extractivism of our abundant natural resources such as aquifers, oil, gas, lithium, gold, silver, copper, uranium, rare earths… and to authorize the installation of military bases in our territory, which is of significant geostrategic importance.

Meanwhile, the already weak democracy and the rule of law are being erased, as the separation of powers, the health, education and social security systems, science and technology, sources of employment and social assistance to the most vulnerable are systematically destroyed. We wake up every day with bad news of this tsunami that empties and erases essential state institutions and our sovereignty. Behind the propaganda and deceptions in social media with the slogan “FREEDOM ADVANCES” is the truth: “DESTRUCTIVE COLONIALISM ADVANCES”.

These days, Trump has threatened that there would be a tremendous economic disaster in the country if Milei did not win the legislative elections. The result was that he won, although with 16% fewer votes than two years ago (down from 56% to 40%), and with low voter turnout.

It is worth asking ourselves: Did people vote out of fear of pressure from Trump and other envoys, out of hatred of Peronism and polarization, out of an every person for themself sentiment, out of belief in the government’s promises, out of political ignorance, out of resignation, or out of support for the violent…? It is difficult to analyze, but we know that the triumph will deepen this colonialist policy – which is devastating for the middle and lower social sectors – while officials and the powerful elite will continue to enrich themselves and cynically practice their corruption, which the official narrative seeks to cover up with absurd explanations. At the same time, the opposition, disunited and weak, does not move forward with the impeachment trial that is so just and necessary.

This situation challenges us as a community of Mercy to unite church groups and organizations that denounce injustices and deceit, accompany legitimate protests, educate about trampled rights by helping to sustain critical thinking, draw strength from spirituality, and honor the national history of struggle for democracy and resistance to foreign oppression.

In these dark times, may the Spirit of Light and Love encourage us to be reborn from the ruins through solidarity, hopeful union, acceptance of those who are different, and care for all life. Amen.

Back to top


Countering misinformation

Ryan W Roberts, OLF; Institute Justice Team

No matter where you’re situated on the political spectrum, you doubtlessly have loud voices telling you to watch out for unreliable information or “fake news”. Some of those voices are from your past: parents, priests, and schoolteachers. Other voices are current: journalists, politicians, entertainers, and neighbors. We’re all formed by the encounters and experiences we’ve had, and our worldview shapes how we receive new information. An important task of any mindful person is to sift what we hear to discern what’s actually true.

One of the best tools we have in countering misinformation is a healthy dose of skepticism. Don’t take things at face value. Seek confirmation elsewhere, especially when it too closely matches your hopes or when it seems too good to be true. Lots of people benefit from our unexamined belief. Even sources we trust need verification; every source has a bias, even if you agree with it. Look for confirmation from multiple, unrelated sources.

Another important skill is finding the origin of information. The best accounts are primary sources, people reporting on themselves or events they personally witnessed. Those that have objective measurements—like scientists—or get independent evaluation—like peer-reviewed studies—come with a lot of built-in corroboration. On the other hand, lawyers and law enforcement will tell you that eye-witness accounts can be unreliable, requiring several stories to approach the objective truth of an event. Video or audio recordings are generally treated as objective if their contents are unaltered, while humans and the stories they tell or write are subject to numerous external factors and stimuli. The trustworthiness of a primary source is often related to its expertise, motivations, perceptiveness, and accurate recording skill.

Secondary sources are intermediaries that relate the content of a primary source and might summarize, provide context, elaborate, or analyze the primary source in some way. News reports are a prominent form of secondary source. The trustworthiness of a secondary source is often established by examining the primary sources used and developing a pattern of reliable reporting on other primary sources. The Justice Team has made some recommendations at the bottom of this article.

While evaluating sources for reliability is good practice in choosing where to go for news and other information, sometimes you encounter information from a source you don’t know. How can you evaluate whether a particular “fact” is indeed factual? This is where fact checking becomes important. Seeking corroboration from your trusted sources works in a lot of cases, but sometimes what you received is a bit more niche. Many times, its rarity is a clue to question its veracity. On the other hand, there are lots of truths that simply aren’t significant enough to get broad coverage in other sources. The Justice Team suggests a few fact-checking sites below.

Don’t become an unwitting pawn in someone else’s scheme for profit, influence, or propaganda. Never share a “gotcha” meme on social media without verifying its information. Don’t relate something you heard or read without a caveat or some deeper investigation. In a culture rife with misinformation like ours is today, you can be a finger in the dike that stops the overwhelming flood of lies playing right into the hands of power- and money-hungry systems that extract from our lives and the Earth for their own selfish benefit.

Justice Team recommended information sources:

Fact-checking sites to try:

Back to top

Article Archive

2025

November

Critical Considerations:

NSPM-7: Countering or perpetrating political violence?

Advocating on harms of extractive industries

Argentina y el avance del colonialismo / Argentina and the advance of colonialism

Countering misinformation

October

Critical Considerations:

Is it time to reform the Insurrection Act?

COP 30 in the Amazon & Raising Hope in Rome

The dangers of falsely linking Tylenol to autism

September

Mercy sisters call for urgent defense of immigrants

Social extractivism

Critical Considerations:

What is Posse Comitatus all about?

Everyday pilgrimages: the Earth is the Lord’s

August

Critical Considerations:

Are we doomed to a perpetual nuclear arms race?

Love and care of creation in local ecologies

Church document ahead of COP30

July

Critical Considerations:

What’s at stake in Israel’s destruction of Gaza?

Have you heard of Black August?

DEI—Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Mercy Life Gathering in Panama

June

Vampires, Sharecropping, and the Real History of Juneteenth

Protecting Children and Vulnerable Adults from Abuse in the Philippines

Critical Considerations:

What’s really driving border enforcement?

May

A letter to Pope Francis

Critical Considerations:

Is this really an emergency?

Trump’s attacks on women

April

The cultural battle advances

Critical Considerations:

What’s going on with tariffs?

Water extractivism in Palestine

March

Hope for Panama in truth

Deportation stigma in Jamaica

Critical Considerations:

Who benefits from tax cuts? Who pays?

April is SWANA Heritage Month

NETWORK webinar on U.S. federal policy

February

National declaration of emergency in Bajo Aguán

Critical Considerations:

Has the United States declared war on immigrants?

What energy emergency?

January

If you make a mess, clean it up! (Advocacy success in NY)

Youth claim climate victory in Montana court

Critical Considerations:

Was January 1, 2025 a wake-up call?

(click years to expand)

2024

December

Gender and climate justice

Critical Considerations:

Is the United States becoming a plutocracy?

Making nuclear weapons taboo

November

Critical Considerations:

What happened on November 5, 2024?

The Ecological Debt

October

Overturning the Chevron deference

Critical Considerations:

Who are the Israeli settlers and what motivates them?

Assassination of Honduran water protector deeply grieves Sisters of Mercy

September

God walks with his people: National Migration Week September 23–29

Critical Considerations:

What does CEO compensation say about corporate priorities?

Anxiety – election season can heighten it!

August

Critical Considerations:

What is Project 2025 all about?

Working to stop weapon exports to Haiti

Beyond Voting:

Participating in Elections, part 2

July

Critical Considerations:

Is there a better way to spend $91 billion?

Education, Agriculture, & Emigration in the Philippines

Beyond Voting:

Participating in Elections, part 1

June

Critical Considerations:

Are we creating a prison-industrial complex?

Conscience

Mercy student videos address the Critical Concerns

May

Critical Considerations:

Degrowth is the only sane survival plan

Argentina and the government of hate

Listening to a chorus of voices

April

Critical Considerations:

An Israeli Jesuit reflects on war in the Holy Land

Advocacy Success! Expanded Background Checks for Gun Sales

March

Military spending and national (in)security

February

The challenge Gaza war presents for American Jews

January

Gaza war threatens credibility of West’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law

2023

December

Climate Summit fails to adequately respond to gravity of climate crisis

November

Critical Considerations:

The dangers of conflating Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism

Red flag laws in jeopardy: faith voices speak to save them

October

Jewish and Palestinian perspectives on Gaza crisis

September

U.S. China tensions impact efforts to address climate change

August

When Good Economic Policy Isn’t Enough

July

States Move to Weaken Protections for Child Workers

June

Corporate Lobbyists at Climate Talks

May

Electric Vehicle Transition Challenges

April

Repudiating the Doctrine of Discovery

March

Misrepresenting War

February

The Rise of Christian Nationalism

January

How the News is Reported Affects What We Know

2022

December

How Corporations Took Over the Government

November

The Independent State Legislature Theory Explained

October

The Next Phase in the Voting Wars


Local Justice News & Upcoming Events

Check back soon!


Mercy Justice Resource Pages

Peace & Justice Calendars

By Jason Giovannettone, Climate and Sustainability Director

Leaf blowers have become more popular and affordable over the last few decades. Leaf blowers alleviate the physical demands of raking, making them a popular choice for many homeowners and landscapers. Though leaf blowers save much time and effort, they are extremely harmful to the environment (particularly gas-powered blowers) in multiple ways: 

1.     Air Pollution: Gas-powered leaf blowers use a two-stroke engine. In 2017, California’s State Air Resources Board found that one hour of use of the most popular gas-powered leaf blower released as much emissions as driving a new Toyota Camry 1,100 miles (source). They also estimated that total emissions from gas-powered equipment would soon outpace emissions from all cars within the state. This is not only due to increasing popularity, but also because small off-road engines have fewer regulations than automotive engines. 

2.     Destroys Insect & Worm Winter Homes: Brown leaves may appear dead, but they are full of life and provide an indispensable winter habitat in which pollinators, caterpillars, fireflies, worms, ants, beetles, snails, and a host of other organisms live and lay their eggs. The high winds that emanate from a leaf blower decimate this habitat, including both leaves and topsoil. Preserving ground cover will protect myriad organisms, increasing the biodiversity of your yard, which is a very good thing! . 

3.     Noise Pollution: Leaf blowers can produce low-frequency sounds of 100 decibels or more; the low frequency makes the sound especially penetrating. For this reason, Washington, DC, phased out the sale and use of gas-powered leaf blowers with the passing of the Leaf Blower Regulation Amendment Act of 2018, which took effect on January 1, 2022. 

4.     Tree Health: Leaves provide a natural protective cover for tree roots and release valuable nutrients into the soil. Maintaining a layer of leaves alleviates the need to purchase mulch, increases the health of your trees, and reduces the costs of hiring someone to remove your leaves.  

For more information on the negative impacts of leaf blowers, including a detailed comparison between gas and electric leaf blowers, refer to this article provided by the Montgomery County (MD) Department of Environmental Protection. 

Try to avoid or at least reduce the use of leaf blowers throughout the fall . If you need to remove leaves from your yard, consider investing in an electric leaf blower or doing it the old-fashioned way. Also, instead of disposing of the leaves, consider adding them to your compost pile or using them as natural mulch around your trees and other plants. They can also be very effective at preparing portions of your lawn for future vegetables and native gardens.

View last year’s grand prize winning video. (*Note: the contest themes have changed for 2026.)

The Mercy Justice Team needs you, a Mercy student, to create a short, social media style PSA (public service announcement) video – think Reels or TikTok – that reflects the Sisters of Mercy’s Critical Concerns. Put those creative ideas and video skills to work and you could win $500!


What does it mean to allow others to be fully human without judgment?

The 2026 contest theme is: Embracing Dignity and Respect. Through the lenses of the Mercy Critical Concerns and the Core Values of Mercy Education, use your video to engage one of these ideas:

How can we stand up with others or stand up for others?

How can we go beyond tolerance to embrace diversity?


To receive information, updates and reminders about this year’s contest, sign up here and we’ll be in touch. Click here to learn rules for entry and how to upload your video.

View the grand prize winning video from 2024. (*Note: the contest themes have changed for 2026.)

Purpose

For this year’s contest we are seeking short, PSA style videos (30 to 90 seconds) that are suitable for sharing on social media platforms such as TikTok or Reels. In an increasingly divided and polarized world, your video should reflect the charism of Mercy and connect to one or more of the Mercy Critical Concerns. Videos could focus on:

Why it is important to value or celebrate our differences

Encouraging support of oppressed or marginalized groups in society

A story of standing in solidarity with others


Contest Webinar

Watch our 13 minute webinar to learn more about this year’s contest.


Who Can Enter

Any student or group of students, high school age or older, enrolled in Mercy high schools, colleges/universities, or involved in a Mercy-affiliated ministry.

Use this tip-sheet to help you as you begin the process of creating your video.

Format

Read the complete rules

Length: 30 to 90 seconds

Language: English or Spanish

Other Requirements

1. Title. Each video must have a title. The title must be indicated on the submission form. The title does not need to be included in the video itself.

2. Credits. Credits must include the name of those involved in the creation of the video. The credits must also include citations for any images, audio, or text used in the video that is not original. The credits do not need to be included in the video itself, but must be included in the submission form.

The Sisters of Mercy may delete title and credit screens before posting videos on social media.

Entrants are strongly encouraged to use original footage and graphics as much as possible.

Important Note on Rules: In order to honor copyright protections, rules regarding use of images and music were updated for the 2022 contest and remain in effect for 2026. See the complete rules for details.

Deadline

All entries must be received by April 1, 2026.

Prizes

A panel of judges will use these criteria to select the winning video. Individual winners will receive financial awards. The Grand Prize Winner receives $500.

Winning entries may be featured on the Sisters of Mercy Institute web site and social media channels. Winners and their winning institution will be formally announced.

Interested?

If you think you might be interested in entering this contest, fill out this form to receive contest information and updates.

Past Winners

Click here to view all of our past winners.

By Marianne Comfort, member of the Mercy Justice Team

Mercy schools in Jamaica offer inspiration for how educational institutions can adopt environmentally sustainable practices in response to our critical concern for Earth. 

Alpha Primary School, Jessie Primary School, Alpha Academy and the Alpha Vocational Training Centre share one campus in the capital city of Kingston. 

This year 10 clearly marked recycling bins were installed on the property to engender a culture of recycling and sustainable waste management among students and staff.  

Guided by two gardening experts, students from the four schools planted a variety of trees and other plants in a memorial garden that honors sisters who had been instrumental to the schools’ success. Throughout this process, students learned the plants’ features, names, uses and more.  

Older students formed groups in which they designed and planned campaigns to tackle water shortage, waste management, deforestation and other issues.  

Finally, students took turns making personal pledges to engage in actions that mitigate the effects of climate change. 

The schools look forward to creating more opportunities for students and staff to care for the Earth, including through a compost heap now being planned. 

By Jason Giovannettone, Climate and Sustainability Director

Dr. Tracey Woodruff from the University of California in San Francisco recently published an article about effective ways to reduce exposure to microplastics.

We have covered the concern of microplastics in previous Green Tips articles, but if you are interested in reading more refer to this article: “Effects of Microplastic Exposure on Human Digestive, Reproductive, and Respiratory Health: A Rapid Systematic Review.”

Some suggestions for reducing your exposure to microplastics include:

  • Eat food prepared at home to minimize processed and fast foods. 
  • When eating out, look for restaurants that are trying to be more sustainable, especially in the use of non-plastic packaging (e.g., Wendy’s uses customer-facing packaging made from cardboard sourced from sustainably managed forests). 
  • Look for condiments that come in glass jars. Minimize your overall consumption of foods packaged in plastic. 
  • Pack your own meals when traveling.
  • Microwave food in glass instead of plastic containers.
  • Minimize the purchasing of frozen vegetables in plastic packaging.  At a minimum, transfer frozen vegetables to a non-plastic container prior to microwaving.
  • Avoid purchasing water packaged in single-use bottles.
  • Resist the urge to use plastic produce bags when purchasing fresh fruits and vegetables.
  • Cook food in stainless steel or cast-iron instead of nonstick pots and pans.
  • Eat as low in the food chain as possible (e.g., fruits and vegetables). Larger animals and fish tend to have higher concentrations of harmful chemicals.
  • Dust often and use a vacuum with a HEPA filter. Microplastics in the air tend to cling to dust, so it is important to remove dust and to use a vacuum that can filter very fine particles from the air.
  • Use fragrance-free cleaning and personal care products.

Attempting to follow all of these suggestions can seem like a daunting task.  Try to address one at a time until they eventually become a necessary habit.

By Jason Giovannettone, Climate and Sustainability Director 

As we move into warmer months, many of us are finalizing travel plans for the summer. The way we travel though can have a substantial impact on the environment. So how do we know when to take a train, plane, automobile, or bus? We will consider this question from the standpoint of trying to minimize the amount of greenhouse gas emissions created. 

Emissions due to travel are dependent on the following:  

  • fuel mileage (miles per gallon or mpg) 
  • the amount of gas emissions created for each gallon of fuel, or each kWh of electricity used 
  • the number of people traveling with you.  

1. Fuel Mileage: Fuel mileage varies considerably depending on the type of transportation and the extent to which transportation depends on electricity vs. liquid fuel (e.g., gasoline, diesel, jet fuel). The average estimated mileage for various transportation and fuel types is given below: 

  • Automobiles (all): 28.3 mpg 
  • Automobiles (hybrid): 50.0 mpg (represents the low end of the expected range of fuel mileage for a 2024 Toyota Prius, which can get up to 57.0 mpg.) 
  • Domestic Flights (jet fuel): 0.50 mpg 
  • Transit Trains (diesel): 6.9 mpg 
  • Amtrak Trains (electric): 0.10 miles per kWh 
  • Transit Bus (diesel): 4.0 mpg 
  • Intercity Bus (diesel): 6.4 mpg 

2. Carbon Emissions per Gallon: This measures the carbon emissions that are created for each gallon of fuel or kWh of electricity consumed. Estimates are given below as pounds of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per gallon of fuel or electricity. Note: the term “carbon dioxide equivalents” refers to the combined impacts of all greenhouse gases. 

  • Gasoline: 20.86 pounds of CO2e per gallon 
  • Diesel: 22.45 pounds of CO2e per gallon 
  • Jet Fuel: 21.50 pounds of CO2e per gallon 
  • Electric: 0.81 pounds of CO2e per kWh 

3. Number of People: If you are in a car with one other person, you are responsible for half of the emissions created during the trip. If you are on a plane with hundreds of people, you are responsible for a smaller portion of the emissions created by the plane. The values provided below are rough averages of the number of passengers per transportation type and are only provided as examples. 

  • Automobiles (all): 1.5 passengers per vehicle 
  • Domestic Flights: ~120.4 passengers per flight 
  • Amtrak Trains: ~169.6 passengers per train 
  • Transit Bus: maximum capacity = 60 to 90 passengers 
  • Intercity Bus: ~43.7 passengers per trip 

Conclusions: 

When only considering the efficiency of the fuel used, automobiles seem like the more environmentally friendly option when traveling.  But when considering the substantially higher number of people who typically travel on a single train or airplane, automobiles (excluding hybrids) emit more greenhouse gases per mile than a train or airplane (see below for individual carbon footprints of each passenger). As the number of passengers increases to 3 or more, automobiles become a more sustainable choice.   

  1. Transit Trains (electric): 0.15 lbs CO2e per mile 
  2. Amtrak Trains (electric & diesel): 0.26 lbs CO2e per mile 
  3. Automobiles (hybrid): ~0.27 lbs CO2e per mile (based on the lower end of expected mileage for a 2024 Toyota Prius) 
  4. Domestic Flights (jet fuel): 0.39 lbs CO2e per mile 
  5. Automobiles (all fuel types): 0.48 lbs CO2e per mile 
  6. Transit Bus (diesel): 0.80 lbs CO2e per mile 
  7. Demand Response (includes Uber): 2.70 lbs CO2e per mile 

Green Tip 

When planning your next trip, try to use more sustainable forms of transportation based on the information above. Consider the number of passengers who will be traveling with you when you make your decision. 

Sources 

  1. United States Department of Energy (2022) 
  1. United States Department of Energy (2025) 
  1. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2025) 
  1. United States Energy Information Administration (2024a) 
  1. United States Energy Information Administration (2024b) 
  1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2022). “Transportation Energy Data Book Edition 40.” 
  1. Amtrak FY 2024 Company Profile