donate

January 2024

Articles from Mercy:

Local Justice News & Upcoming Mercy Events:

Justice Resources & Links


If you make a mess, clean it up!

Catherine Darcy, RSM; Institute Justice Team

In May, 2024, New York Governor Kathy Hochul gathered with a diverse international group of researchers, faith leaders, policymakers, and government officials for the Vatican summit entitled From Climate Crisis to Climate Resilience. Pope Francis presided over this summit which led to this resilience protocol.

Perhaps that gathering affected Governor Hochul, because on December 26, 2024, she signed the Climate Change Superfund Act into law. This law establishes the climate change adaptation cost recovery program by assessing the most egregious of polluters. New York will benefit by receiving $3 billion per year for 25 years, a $75B total. One third of that fund is earmarked for vulnerable communities. This law is based on the concept employed by the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 which required responsible parties to clean up or pay damages for contaminated toxic waste sites. Expressed a little more succinctly, the principle which applies is this: if you make a mess, you clean it up.

Funds gained from this law will take some of the pressure off taxpayers to support community resilience through flood protection, heat response and infrastructure upgrades. This funding will protect our subway stations from flooding, strengthen our power grid, and create cooling centers in vulnerable neighborhoods. Last year alone, New Yorkers paid $2.2 billion in climate disaster costs. Now, polluters will help foot the bill.

The significance of New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act becoming law is not lost on climate activists throughout the United States. These activists have been working on similar bills in other states as well as the federal Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act. On July 1, 2024, Vermont’s Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program went into effect. Similar bills based on the polluter pays principle have been introduced in the states of California, Maryland, Massachusetts and New Jersey. In a virtual gathering a few days after the signing, NY Senate sponsor of the bill, Senator Liz Krueger, suggested that now that New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act has been signed, additional states will be introducing similar bills, as well.

In order to assist other states in moving forward similar legislation, the New York Public Interest Research Group, which led the coalition that worked on New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act, will offer a webinar reviewing the strategy and process used to pass the bill and then obtain Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature on it. The time and date of that webinar have yet to be determined. However, if you would be interested in attending, please contact cdarcy@sistersofmercy.org.

Back to top


Youth claim climate victory in Montana court

Marianne Comfort; Institute Justice Team

Young people in Montana have won a landmark victory in claiming that the state’s failure to address climate change violates the rights of current and future generations. The recent ruling now requires the state to consider greenhouse gas emissions when reviewing permits for fossil fuel projects.

A group of residents, aged 5 through 22, filed a lawsuit in March 2020 charging that Montana’s State Energy Policy Act is unconstitutional. The law prohibits the state from considering the impacts of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions in its environmental reviews of energy projects. A district court in August 2023 agreed with the plaintiffs that the law violates the public’s right to a clean and healthful environment under the state’s constitution. The state supreme court affirmed that ruling on Dec. 14, 2024.

The case is among several lawsuits filed over the past 10 years by young people claiming harms from the federal government’s and state governments’ failure to take bold action on climate change.

The Sisters of Mercy of the Americas Institute Leadership Team signed onto “friends of the court” briefs in support of a federal lawsuit first filed by young people in 2015. That case is still moving through legal processes, and on Jan. 13, 2025, 43 members of Congress signed a brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to let the case proceed.

Sisters in Rhode Island have supported youth making similar claims against that state.

The Montana ruling is the first climate victory for young plaintiffs in the courts. In a separate case last year, Hawaii settled out of court with youth in a move that commits the state to fully de-carbonize its transportation systems by 2045.

In these cases, young people share how climate change is already affecting their health, income, and heritage. Examples include extreme summer heat, smoke-filled skies, major floods, and the disruption of Native cultural practices tied to seasonal cycles.

Back to top


Critical Considerations

Was January 1, 2025 a wake-up call?

Karen Donahue, RSM

On New Year’s Day, the U.S. woke up to news of a horrific mass casualty event in New Orleans.  A man driving a pick-up truck plowed into revelers in the city’s famed French Quarter, killing 14 people and injuring several dozen more. Later that morning, a Tesla Cybertruck packed with explosives was detonated in front of a Trump hotel in Las Vegas, killing the driver. The perpetrators in both of these incidents were U.S. military veterans.

According to the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), a research, education and training center at the University of Maryland, analysis of the Profiles of Individual Radicalization in the United States (PIRUS) database showed that having a U.S. military background is the strongest individual-level predictor of whether a person listed in the PIRUS data is classified as a mass casualty offender. This correlation outweighed other factors, including mental health issues, membership in an extremist group, criminal history and age.

Analysis of the ideology driving mass casualty events indicates that the majority (73.5%) of the offenders with military backgrounds in the PIRUS database had links to far-right domestic extremist groups (anti-government/militia/sovereign citizen, white supremacist/nativist). Only 15% had ties to foreign Islamic extremist groups such as ISIS or al Qaeda.

In a January 2, 2025 article posted on his website, Informed Comment, University of Michigan history professor Juan Cole examines  the January 1 attacks and reflects on our tendency to look outside when a mass casualty event occurs within our borders. The initial assumption is often that the individual or individuals involved are immigrants and that they have ties to foreign terrorist groups. He also notes how the media treats white perpetrators differently from those of other races and ethnicities.

In an interview with The Guardian (a British newspaper), Bishop Garrison, a decorated military veteran who led the Biden administration’s efforts to deal with extremism in the U.S. military, warned that there could be more attacks if the Pentagon does not take this threat seriously. Referring to January 1, he said, “Both incidents demonstrate the sleeping danger that we have failed to deal with as a country.”

Back to top

Article Archive

2025

January

If you make a mess, clean it up! (Advocacy success in NY)

Youth claim climate victory in Montana court

Critical Considerations:

Was January 1, 2025 a wake-up call?

(click years to expand)

2024

December

Gender and climate justice

Critical Considerations:

Is the United States becoming a plutocracy?

Making nuclear weapons taboo

November

Critical Considerations:

What happened on November 5, 2024?

The Ecological Debt

October

Overturning the Chevron deference

Critical Considerations:

Who are the Israeli settlers and what motivates them?

Assassination of Honduran water protector deeply grieves Sisters of Mercy

September

God walks with his people: National Migration Week September 23–29

Critical Considerations:

What does CEO compensation say about corporate priorities?

Anxiety – election season can heighten it!

August

Critical Considerations:

What is Project 2025 all about?

Working to stop weapon exports to Haiti

Beyond Voting:

Participating in Elections, part 2

July

Critical Considerations:

Is there a better way to spend $91 billion?

Education, Agriculture, & Emigration in the Philippines

Beyond Voting:

Participating in Elections, part 1

June

Critical Considerations:

Are we creating a prison-industrial complex?

Conscience

Mercy student videos address the Critical Concerns

May

Critical Considerations:

Degrowth is the only sane survival plan

Argentina and the government of hate

Listening to a chorus of voices

April

Critical Considerations:

An Israeli Jesuit reflects on war in the Holy Land

Advocacy Success! Expanded Background Checks for Gun Sales

March

Military spending and national (in)security

February

The challenge Gaza war presents for American Jews

January

Gaza war threatens credibility of West’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law

2023

December

Climate Summit fails to adequately respond to gravity of climate crisis

November

Critical Considerations:

The dangers of conflating Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism

Red flag laws in jeopardy: faith voices speak to save them

October

Jewish and Palestinian perspectives on Gaza crisis

September

U.S. China tensions impact efforts to address climate change

August

When Good Economic Policy Isn’t Enough

July

States Move to Weaken Protections for Child Workers

June

Corporate Lobbyists at Climate Talks

May

Electric Vehicle Transition Challenges

April

Repudiating the Doctrine of Discovery

March

Misrepresenting War

February

The Rise of Christian Nationalism

January

How the News is Reported Affects What We Know

2022

December

How Corporations Took Over the Government

November

The Independent State Legislature Theory Explained

October

The Next Phase in the Voting Wars


Local Justice News & Upcoming Events

Check back soon!


Mercy Justice Resource Pages

Peace & Justice Calendars

Sister Mary-Paula Cancienne & Jason Giovannettone

Taking time to become as informed as possible about concerns related to sustainability, especially those that affect our lifestyle, is a wise practice; many actions that initially appear to have a positive effect on the planet may cause harm and/or have harmful social implications.  

For example, installing solar panels on your roof is great for the planet because solar is one of the cleanest sources of energy available. But we also know that many companies source the panel materials from countries or regions of the world that are considered conflict zones where unfair labor practices are common, and/or where the  local communities are negatively impacted by the extraction of raw materials.  

As a second example, electric vehicles (EVs) may seem like a great way to reduce our carbon footprint, but the extent to which that is true depends on where you live and how much of your electricity is sourced from fossil fuels. Many of the metals used to create EV batteries  are sourced from regions where child labor is rampant, where there is deforestation due to mining, or where groundwater quality and quantity are depleted to a level that cannot sustain human or animal life.  

Purchasing toothbrushes or utensils made from bamboo may sound like a more environmental-friendly option when compared to plastic, but they may be causing significant harm to critical habitats if the bamboo is not certified to have been grown and harvested in a sustainable manner (certified by the FSC or Forest Stewardship Council).  

There are always trade-offs, but some are wiser than others; Information and awareness are important. As you consider sustainability in your life, ask the following questions: 

What are the practices that shape my own formation around love and care of Earth? What do we need to form ourselves into people who have sincere concern for the environment, who are willing to take informed actions to conserve Earth’s environment, and who have the passion to spread a message in a way that is not confrontational and not righteous, but whose attitude and practices lean more toward invitations to address problems as equal members of a community. Not necessarily easy, risk and sacrifice are always possibilities. 

Consider implementing these sustainable practices: 

  • Purchase a bamboo toothbrush. 
  • Purchase a native plant (maybe wait for the spring for this one). 
  • Try a shampoo bar. 
  • Select “no” each time you are asked whether you would like a receipt at the gas pump. 
  • Identify the trees and plants growing in your yard using an app such as “Picture This.” 
  • Remove the vines from one of your trees. (This really helped me realize what a negative impact invasive vines have on tree growth.) 
  • Use laundry and/or dishwasher tablets. 
  • Refrain from using straws with your drinks when dining out. 
  • Purchase “pasture raised” or “free range” organic eggs that come in a cardboard carton.
  • Brain-storm with friends for other ideas and investigate their pros and cons. 
  • With a friend or as a family/group, choose an idea to enact and be mutually supportive. 

By Bailey Woodward, Justice intern 

As the holidays approach, you may already be planning your family celebrations. Traditions look different from home to home, but one unifying factor seems to be a shared meal. Gathering around the table with your loved ones and breaking bread fosters an atmosphere of love and community.    

This year, as we celebrate togetherness, we can also embrace the idea of sustainability in our holiday meals. A great place to start is with the source of your ingredients. You may consider shopping from local businesses or farmers’ markets over large-chain grocery stores. By doing this, not only are you supporting small local businesses, but you are also reducing the carbon footprint associated with transporting food long distances. If your meal typically includes meat, you may also consider purchasing from a local farm that practices humane and sustainable farming.    

Another way to have a more sustainable holiday dinner is to reduce your food waste. Be creative about using leftovers and food scraps. In my own home, we use leftover turkey to make a turkey-noodle soup. By using up all of your leftovers, you are reducing waste and saving yourself money too.    

These mindful choices can help us celebrate the holidays in a way that honors Christ, our loved ones and the planet, making our holiday celebrations even more meaningful. Happy holidays! 

By Jason Giovannettone, Climate and Sustainability Director 

One common sustainability concern that I hear (and often think about personally) is whether there are options for purchasing sustainable candy (in terms of both ingredients and packaging) or other packaged snacks to hand out to trick-or-treaters on Halloween. Much of the packaging of candy and other snacks is not recyclable, which adds to plastic waste. Passing out unpackaged candy will likely result in it being thrown away immediately by caring parents, adding to food waste.   

Why are most candy and snack wrappers and bags unrecyclable? Such packaging is often made of a mix of individually recyclable materials such as plastic, tin, aluminum, and others.  The problem is that when you mix these together, they are extremely time-consuming and expensive to separate, and, as such, considered non-recyclable.  Therefore, when tempted to recycle your empty chip bag with other recyclable bags, it should go in the trash; otherwise, it may contaminate the other bags and cause everything to end up in the landfill. 

There are a few more sustainable options available when purchasing treats for Halloween.  Look for candies packaged in cardboard boxes or wrapped in aluminum foil such as Junior Mints, Milk Duds and Nerds.  Many types of chocolate are individually wrapped in foil.  When ordering any type of candy online, try to verify whether it is shipped in a box or some type of plastic packaging.  There are many options for foil-wrapped candy, especially Halloween chocolates, available online through the Natural Candy Store website. Some of the chocolates sold through the website (e.g., chocolates made by Thompson) are also listed as being Fair Trade Certified, which means that they were made in a way that supports the livelihoods of the producers, their communities and the surrounding environment. 

If you much prefer treats that are packaged in difficult-to-recycle mixed packaging, some of the packaging can be recycled through Terracycle; you just need to print a free shipping label, collect the items in a box and mail them in.  A full list of companies with packaging that can be recycled can be found here.   

Green Tip 

During the next few weeks, try substituting one candy or snack that you typically purchase with one that is either unpackaged or comes in packaging other than plastic.  For an extra challenge, look for snacks that are Fair Trade Certified and/or come in cardboard or paper packaging that is FSC-certified (i.e., certified by the Forest Stewardship Council that the trees or other plants used to make the packaging were sustainably grown and harvested). 

View last year’s grand prize winning video. (*Note: the contest themes have changed for 2025.)

The Mercy Justice Team needs you, a Mercy student, to create a short, social media style PSA (public service announcement) video – think Reels or TikTok – that reflects the Sisters of Mercy’s Critical Concerns. Put those creative ideas and video skills to work and you could win $500!


How do women impact the world for good?

How can individuals reduce their consumption to better care for the Earth?

What is a policy or campaign that could help people reduce their consumption?

Who are the heroines of the Mercy Critical Concerns?


To receive information, updates and reminders about this year’s contest, complete this form and we’ll be in touch. Click here to learn rules for entry and how to upload your video.

View the grand prize winning videos from 2023. (*Note: the contest themes have changed for 2025.)

Purpose

For this year’s contest we are seeking short, PSA style videos (30 to 90 seconds) that are suitable for sharing on social media platforms such as TikTok or Reels. Video entries must focus on one of these topics:

The Power of Women
  • Videos should reflect the charism of Mercy and highlight the gifts and contributions that women, either individually or collectively, bring to society.
  • Videos could promote the contributions of women, tell the story, past or present, of a woman or women engaged in Mercy or justice, or dream about the future for women in society.
Reducing Consumption
  • Videos should reflect the Mercy Critical Concerns, especially the Critical Concern for Earth, but do not need to identify the Critical Concerns specifically.
  • Videos should encourage actions toward reducing consumption either on the personal or societal level.
  • Videos could be inspirational or motivational, provide a ‘how-to’ process for reducing consumption or provide information about the consequences of conspicuous consumption.

Contest Webinar

Watch our 17 minute webinar to learn more about this year’s contest.


Who Can Enter

Any student or group of students, high school age or older, enrolled in Mercy high schools, colleges/universities, or involved in a Mercy-affiliated ministry.

Use this tip-sheet to help you as you begin the process of creating your video.

Format

Read the complete rules

Length: 30 to 90 seconds

Language: English or Spanish

Other Requirements

1. Title. Each video must have a title. The title must be indicated on the submission form. The title does not need to be included in the video itself.

2. Credits. Credits must include the name of those involved in the creation of the video. The credits must also include citations for any images, audio, or text used in the video that is not original. The credits do not need to be included in the video itself, but must be included in the submission form.

The Sisters of Mercy may delete title and credit screens before posting videos on social media.

Entrants are strongly encouraged to use original footage and graphics as much as possible.

Important Note on Rules: In order to honor copyright protections, rules regarding use of images and music were updated for the 2022 contest and remain in effect for 2025. See the complete rules for details.

Deadline

All entries must be received by April 1, 2025.

Prizes

A panel of judges will use these criteria to select the winning video. Individual winners will receive financial awards. The Grand Prize Winner receives $500.

Winning entries may be featured on the Sisters of Mercy Institute web site and social media channels. Winners and their winning institution will be formally announced.

Interested?

If you think you might be interested in entering this contest, fill out this form to receive contest information and updates.

Past Winners

Click here to view all of our past winners.

By Sister Joan Margret Schwager 

Things I have done to care for the Earth: 

I have created a compost bin for scraps and use the composted materials in my garden. 

I grew a garden each year with vegetables that lessen my dependence on getting things from the store. 

I have two water barrels; one to catch rainwater so that I have “natural” water for indoor plants and garden and the other gets filled with water from the dehumidifier and air conditioning. 

I bake my own bread. I also make my own jam and jelly.  

I cook from “scratch” whenever possible so I’m not buying “packaged” items. 

I buy in bulk: beans, lentils etc. I also make my own black bean and lentil burgers. 

I freeze produce from the garden for the winter. 

I like to make use of rummage sales and garage sales instead of buying things that are new. 

I use ceiling fans to lessen reliance on air conditioning and heating. 

I also sew blankets from scraps, even old T-shirts. 

Lastly, I remind our schools to not use Styrofoam. 

I hope this list gives you ideas for how you can also care for the Earth.  

Preparation for Session 6

Prior to the session, participants should read Deep Transformation from the Self-Study Guide, paying particular attention to the definition of transformation and to the cases of transformative action. Access the suggested opening prayer, or select another prayer.

Outline for Session 6

Welcome and Prayer

After a welcome and any initial business, lead the opening prayer. The suggested prayer has space for personal reflection. Invite participants to share their reflections with the group.

Discussion

Remind participants of where we are in the process. We have listened deeply to the impacts of extractivism on people, communities and Earth. We have examined extractivism through various theological lenses, through analysis of systems that help the extractive development model to thrive, and through intersections with other contemporary issues. We are now looking at how this process has transformed us and is leading us into action.

Share this excerpt from the Self-Study Guide to ground your group’s conversation:

Transformation is not focused on a “one-time event of clarity and action” but a tug to always dig deeper.

Invite participants into a few moments of silent reflection to consider these questions:

  • What learning or insight in the process so far most stays with you?
  • How is that calling you to shift your perceptions? 
  • How does it feel to move toward deep transformation and action?

Invite participants to briefly share their insights.

Next, invite participants into a few minutes of silent reflection on the case studies. Pose these questions for their consideration:

  • Which example and category of action spoke to you most? Why?
  • How does it influence your thoughts on what an appropriate individual, communal and corporate response would be?

Invite participants to share, and then invite the group to consider any commonalities among the individual responses. Where does this conversation seem to be leading the group?

Moving Into Action

Now that you have completed this journey of Deep Listening, Deep Reflecting and Deep Transformation, the next steps are up to individual participants and the group. Individually or collectively, they can tap into their deeper understanding and sense of where they feel called and look for opportunities to take action in solidarity with people, communities and Earth.

Learning about, reflecting on and discussing extractivism was important. Deciding to take action, the next step on this journey, is equally important. Failure to take action, to make a change, leaves the process incomplete.

This guide does not prescribe specific actions for participants to take. Individually or as a group, participants must discern their own choices for action. We do provide the following resources and suggestions.

Invite participants to look at the frequently updated Action Page, which contains information on current issues that are global in scope , as well as calls to action at the national level in the United States. They might find these resources helpful as they discern their next steps.

Since extractivism has very local impacts, we suggest participants focus their efforts first on what is happening in their own community or nearby communities. Encourage them to seek out organizations acting in solidarity with communities and natural spaces threatened by extractive industries and subscribe to their mailing lists. Getting to know these organizations will help participants determine how their skills, time and knowledge can best be utilized.  

If the group wants to take action together, set another meeting time to identify concrete action and start planning.

We would love to know how you choose to take action and to hear about the fruits of your actions. You may email us at justice@sistersofmercy.org.

Prayer

The prayer resource is available here.

Deep Transformation: Moving into a life in harmony with people, communities and Earth

In our reflections, we have listened to, read about and seen video accounts of the life experiences of people and an Earth that have been negatively affected by extractivism.

We have analyzed and interpreted what we saw and heard. We applied various theological lenses and different perspectives to help us make meaning of those horrendous accounts. We have explored some of the difficulties wrought by the lens of the traditional Western theologies that have so long supported domination, subjugation, oppression and devastation through economic, political, cultural, religious and social means.

Our exploration has animated us to respond to and center our response in the cries of those made poor and the cries of Earth. The devastation of extractivism is unquestionable, yet the issue is complex. We know we may be complicit in the extractive development model by consumption of the products made with extractive industry byproducts as well as through our investment in extractive companies.

Now we are called to respond in a way that continues to center the voices of the people, communities and Earth most impacted by extractivism that have transformed our understanding.

  • What do you  see and understand differently now?
  • How do you ensure that you continue to move forward centered in the voices of people most impacted by extractives instead of in the stories of corporations, consumerism and those who have traditionally held power?
  • How do you  engage with others who have participated in this process?
  • Can you imagine how we might  use our individual, communal and corporate voices to awaken our world to what we have learned?
  • How am I called to respond to and with those who have been most impacted? That is the big question!

How the Theological Lenses Move Us to Transformation

Pope Francis’ Laudato Si’ lens challenges us: “Many things have to change course, but it is we human beings above all who need to change.” He calls for “new attitudes, new convictions — new ways of being together in this world.” We need to be against what is death-dealing, disastrous, destructive. We need to be protective and care for all creation.

#225 An integral ecology includes taking time to recover a serene harmony with creation, reflecting on our lifestyle and our ideals, and contemplating the Creator who lives among us and surrounds us, whose presence “must not be contrived but found, uncovered.”

#229 We must regain the conviction that we need one another, that we have a shared responsibility for others and the world, and that being good and decent are worth it.

Ivone Gebara (Ecofeminism Lens) shares Pope Francis’ belief that humans are called to change:

“The invitation to love and to be mercy does not come from a reality that is external to us; rather, it is an urge that is present in our very humanity. Within our very being, there throbs in us an incredible attraction toward other beings, toward creation. We must allow our life experiences to be our first teacher.”

Daniel Castillo (Ecoliberation Lens) teaches that Christians are to respond to our planetary emergencies in a way that is grounded both in the preferential option for those made poor and Earth. Our response must reflect our belief in who God is and what God desires.

Engaging in Transformation

As you move forward in the third dimension of our theological reflection of extractivism, you may be tempted to act big, be bold and make a significant change. Practice keeping  those decisions and those actions in perspective:

  • Who is leading your decision-making?
  • What do you need to prioritize in your decision-making regarding extractives?

This is not the END of the process but part of the circle. How can you continue to learn and be open to continued transformation?   

What does it mean to acknowledge our individual and collective power and ensure that our actions, while courageous and compassionate, are not driven by that power but in solidarity with Black, Indigenous and people of color communities and Earth?

Transformation is not focused on a “one-time event of clarity and action” but a tug to always dig deeper. It is just as important to advocate for transformation at the systemic level as it is to commit to transformation at the personal level.

Case Studies of Transformative Action

We have collected some Case Studies, to show where communities have responded when their decisions and actions are centered in the experiences of the people, communities and Earth most impacted by extractives. These are not intended to serve as an exhaustive list, but the categories presented offer the structure to explore the paths that may be taken, depending on the situation. They are all different examples, but as you read, pay attention to the similarities and the common themes.

Read these stories with the same curiosity and engagement that you have used for all the stories and witness  accounts throughout this process. Where else in the videos and articles in this process did you learn of transformative responses? What do they have in common?

After reflecting on these examples, spend some time in prayer and writing in your journal as you contemplate the following questions:

  • What other examples from your own experience and work fit with these examples?
  • What do you find yourself drawn to in these illustrative examples within each category? Does that surprise you? Would you have been drawn to the same example at the beginning of this process?

Final Reflection

It is impossible to  move forward without taking time to review your notes and journal entries recorded throughout the process. Give yourself prayerful space and time to recall the  reflection you have done and how you have learned and grown.  The exercises described below may be helpful to you.

  • Reflection Time: As you have moved through this theological reflection process, what has stirred in you? Were you pulled to act in some way? If so, what level of action (personal or systemic) did you find yourself moving readily toward, and why did you move toward that level? What connections did you make on the systemic level?
  • Creative Expression of your journey: Return now to the voices you heard, the voices of those struggling with the effects of extractivism. Recall the voices of the Indigenous communities and of communities of color most impacted by extractivism. Recall the voices that rose from Earth, the rivers, the trees, and the creatures also impacted by extractivism. We invite you to:
  • Write a letter to Earth or to people or communities or to some living creature or plant most impacted by extractives What would you say? Where do you stand in relation to the voice you have chosen? What does this voice say to you about the impact of extractivism?
  • Create an artistic expression: written (poem, free verse), oral or graphic (painting, sculpture) that illustrates how you have come to understand the integral relationship between people, communities and Earth in a new or enhanced way through this process.

Moving Into Action

We have guided you on this journey of Deep Listening, Deep Reflecting and Deep Transformation. The next steps are up to you. We invite you to tap into your deeper understanding and sense of where you feel called and look for opportunities to take action in solidarity with people, communities and Earth.

Our frequently updated Action Page contains information on current issues that are global in scope, as well as calls to action at the national level in the United States. You might find theresources there helpful.

Since extractivism has very local impacts, we suggest that you focus your efforts on what is happening in your own community or nearby communities. Seek out organizations acting in solidarity with communities and natural spaces threatened by extractive industries. Get on their mailing lists and discern where your skills, time and knowledge can best be utilized.

We would love to know how you choose to take action, and to hear about the fruits of your actions. You may email us at justice@sistersofmercy.org.

Additional Resources to Go Deeper

Mercy Investment Services’ 2022 Accountability Report, which describes its commitment to reducing its holdings of shares in extractive industries and to investing in climate solutions. which describes its commitment to reducing its holdings of shares in extractive industries and to investing in climate solutions.

Robin Kimmerer’s presentation on Reciprocity (52 minutes). The author of Braiding Sweetgrass asks and begins to answer the questions: What does Earth ask of us? What is the relationship of story, science, justice and language?

Preparation for Session 5

Prior to the session, participants should read Deep Reflecting Part 3 from the Self-Study Guide. The following section, Contemplative Reflection, will be reviewed as a group during the session, so there is no need to read it beforehand..

Invite each participant to explore one of the issues that intersects with the impacts of extractivism: Earth (the environment), immigration, nonviolence, racism and women. Participants should be prepared to share their learnings with the group.

Access the interfaith prayer that concludes Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home.

Prepare to show the images of extractivism, which you will reflect on as a group and are available here (PowerPoint / pdf). Ideally, if your meeting is in person, you can share the images in a slide show. Other options include inviting participants to slowly scroll through the images on their own devices or printing the images and passing them around.

Outline for Session 5

Welcome and Prayer

After a welcome and any initial business, lead the group in opening prayer. Invite participants to share anything that came to them during this time of prayer.

Discussion

Remind people of where we are in the process: the third part of Deep Reflecting, where we will explore the intersections of the impacts of extractivism and other current issues in our world. We will use the issues that the Sisters of Mercy of the Americas have identified as their “Critical Concerns:” Earth, immigration, nonviolence, racism and women.

Invite participants to silently reflect and review their journals on their exploration of the intersection of the impacts of extractivism and these other issues.   

Last session, each participant committed to focus on one of these issues. Name each issue in turn and invite the participant(s) who explored that issue to share their learnings.

Use these questions to stimulate sharing and discussion:

  • What new information did you learn from this document? Were there examples shared that you were not aware of?
  • How does this exploration of intersections help you frame your individual and communal, current and future, engagement with extractivism?

Explore together as many intersecting issues as time and interest allows, making sure to save time for the final section.

You will end this session reflecting on and discussing images related to the impacts of extractivism. Choose the number of images that time allows. After a short period of silence with each photo, invite brief sharing from anyone who wants to respond to the following questions:

  • What do I see in this photo? How does it make me feel?
  • What do I see differently now than I would have six months ago?
  • What questions does this image cause me to ask of myself? Or ask of my community or my organization? Where would I go to find answers or to learn more?

Preparation for Session 6

Prior to Session 6, participants should read Deep Transformation from the Self-Study Guide, paying particular attention to the definition of transformation and to the cases of transformative action. We will explore the Case Studies section as a group.

Additional Resources to Go Deeper

Pax Christi International promotes nonviolent responses to extractivism conflicts 
Report examines “fossil fuel racism”

Women lead resistance to extractivism

Continue to Session 6